Tips for buying on Taobao from Singapore

(cr: Taobao Southeast Asia)

Good news for online shopaholics – Taobao had set up its Southeast Asia hub in Singapore.

For the uninitiated, Taobao (淘宝) is the Chinese equivalent to shopping sites like Amazon, Qoo10 or Rakuten.

Prior to the launch of its Southeast Asia office, many in Singapore were unable to buy directly on Taobao as it required customers to have China bank accounts. In addition, most Taobao sellers do not ship overseas. Going through third-party daigou agents to buy on their behalf was the only way Singapore buyers could shop on Taobao, until now.

With the launch of International Parcel Forwarding Service (IPFS) in Singapore – and Malaysia too! – customers can now buy from Taobao and have their orders shipped to Singapore via an international forwarding agent (国际转运商). Continue reading

Advertisements

Remember these ‘handouts’?

In the midst of my home digitisation project to convert paper records to soft copies, I dug out a whole pile of old government letters that notified Singaporeans of the various budget handouts that they would receive for that particular year.

A running list:

Continue reading

致教育部的一封信 (A Letter to MOE)

本想让这个部落格保持全中文,不过这次想发表的和之前的帖子相关,就破例一次吧。(有一必有二?那是后话了。。。)

=====================================

To put this post in context, I have extracted the following from REACH as a prologue:

“At a recent interview with the media, Education Minister Ng Eng Hen shared that his Ministry is studying the possibility of reducing the weighting given to mother tongue languages in the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE). Currently, mother tongue languages carry equal weightage of 25 per cent as the other three examinable subjects, English, Mathematics and Science. The combined aggregate score is used for admission into secondary school.

The Ministry of Education (MOE) has been receiving feedback from parents who expressed concern that their children who are weaker in mother tongue languages have lost out on a place in top secondary schools. In this regard, the Ministry of Education (MOE) will review teaching methods of the mother tongue language to ensure that lessons are tailored to the needs of different groups of students, and at the same time, encourage and incentivise students who are proficient in mother tongue languages to progress further. It was noted that such a move will strengthen Singapore’s bilingual edge, since mother tongue lessons will be pitched at the correct level for the students.”

>>>

And below is a letter that I have sent to MOE via their feedback site:

“Dear MOE, in reference to the recent report on the possible reduction in weightage of Mother Tongue for PSLE, I would like to voice my feedback.

This education policy change may likely impact our renown and reputed bilingual education policy negatively. Our bilingualism has served us well over the decades, putting us as a unique breed who is able to compete on international stage. It is a rare competency not possessed by citizens of many countries, until now.

Many other countries like Britain and China have in recent years put in tremendous amount of efforts to boost their population competency by advocating and encouraging them to learn at least one more language beyond their first language. By reducing the weightage of Mother Tongue in PSLE, Singapore not only sends an implicit signal of the lessening importance of Mother Tongue, it represents a huge step backward for Singapore while other countries are moving forward.

Such policy change will impact many generations to come, with the potential bilingual competency now put to risk. Our Government has always advocated us to be more productive in the face of global competition. With reduced weightage of Mother Tongue in PSLE, it cuts a very revered string in our competency and productivity bow while other countries are adding it to theirs.

No doubt Mother Tongue has been a challenge to some students who are linguistically less inclined. However, they will have to realize that this is a challenge that they will have to learn to deal with, as with many other challenges that they will have to come across later in life. Giving them an easier route to vault themselves up the academic ladder does not bear well to developing their tenacity and perseverance, which are some of the important qualities that would benefit them in their adult lives. In time to come when they hit other speed bumps in life, who will be there to erect easier pathways to success?

We have witnessed how our foreign friends who have come to pursue academic education on our shores excel in learning a new language in just a few years. Their proficiency in the new language even beat some of the very best of Singaporean students who have learned the language for a much longer time. What is more remarkable that all this is done without them having to compromise on their own mother tongue or first language. Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew has also lauded our foreign friends for their diligence and urge Singaporeans to learn from them. The same should extend to our students – they have much to learn from their foreign counterparts, who have the added difficulty of juggling a new language while adapting to a new country.

I therefore sincerely propose to MOE to give this issue thorough consideration before making a decision, as this is going to impact our many generations to come, and in turn the future development and progress of Singapore.

Thank you,
Jenny Teo”

==========================

I am not expecting my letter or that by others to change anything. We just feel that we have to make known our opinions to the ministry in concern, as our future generations have to contend and live with this policy change and the subsequent repercussions in future.

I have also appended related links by some notable folks and a Facebook group on this issue.


“成功与否,谁晓得?”